One paper.
Every mapped copy.
Explore 73 works across the research series: argument, role, keywords, sections, relationships, and copies on Git, SMB, physical storage and the connected Google Drive.
Seven storage surfaces, different levels of evidence
Git and SMB are byte-compared; the Mac catalogue, scoped physical-drive hashes, and live Drive metadata now add distinct evidence to this view.
| Surface | Scope | Verified check | Limit |
|---|
The paper register
73 catalogue positions, including articles, chapters, essays, theses and books; this is a versioned index, not a claim that every archive has been exhausted. Counts below cover mapped files only; a file may be associated with more than one work. Drive counts are folder metadata; disk counts are byte-matched candidates across all mapped scopes.
| Select | Drive metadata | Disk matches | Git–SMB coverage |
|---|
Select a title to inspect its files. “Git only” means absent at the same SMB path; identical copies elsewhere are disclosed in file details.
Selected works
Section digest
Physical-drive and Google Drive copies
| File & mapping evidence | GitHub | SMB | Comparison |
|---|
Relations between papers
Typed links distinguish documented dependencies, shared sources, companion works, and interpretive connections; an arrow does not by itself prove influence.
| From | Relation | To | Evidence and limit |
|---|
Evidence and boundaries
This explorer combines a file comparison with catalogue-based editorial synthesis; manuscript dates and historic submission labels do not establish current readiness or journal status.
The 73-work normalized catalogue supplies the index and précis; the Mac Method Formation Atlas constrains how its relationships are interpreted. Older 30-work and spine catalogues contribute history, with their different numbering and superseded claims kept explicit.
Catalogue sources and their authority
How each file is linked to a paper
Named works and spine numbers come from THE_ORDER.md. Explicit SPINE and POSITION markers link files to those positions. Book anchors are the paths declared in CANONICAL_COPIES.md, an August 2026 decision sheet; the view does not endorse those historical canonical choices.
Other links use disclosed title variants or named project folders and remain candidates. These associations have not been established by reading every document body. Generic or classifier-renamed files may remain unmapped. No mapped files means unknown coverage, not proof that the work is absent.
Default counts include the manuscript and working-copy folders. Enable reference, register and derived files to include supplementary material. Shared files can appear under multiple works; per-paper totals must not be added to reconstruct whole-corpus counts.
What the Git–SMB diff establishes
Both copies point to c13b53e8dfb6. The snapshot has 3,975 Git files and 2,609 SMB working files, excluding Git administration. Of 2,338 missing tracked paths, 1,188 have identical bytes elsewhere inside this SMB corpus and 1,150 do not. This does not prove loss across other archives.
Of the 16 changed shared paths, 11 carry typography-only edits, two typography plus link changes, and three agent instructions. Of the 972 SMB-only files, 970 are Git-ignored; the other two are SQLite sidecars. Nothing was synchronized, restored or deleted.
Git-compatible hashes were computed on the server for the folder behind the named SMB share. Git status independently confirmed the totals. This interface reuses that verified snapshot; it does not silently rescan either source.
A constellation of 73 works
Eight clusters show the catalogue’s functional stages. The network combines the original 37 connections with 52 EMERAULD-grounded comparisons. Position and distance organize the view—they do not establish chronology or influence.
Explore nine intellectual lenses
Select a numbered node for its title, role and sources. Drag empty map space or scroll to pan; use + to zoom. The paper selector also supports keyboard navigation.
Solid lines: explicitly recorded comparisons, dependencies, shared sources or companions. Dashed lines: editorial inferences and other catalogue interpretations. New comparisons are undirected; they do not establish influence. Gold lines: links touching the selected paper. Works without lines remain part of the corpus.
Connections matching the map filters
| Works | Lens and basis | Connection and evidence |
|---|
Accessible node and cluster list
| Node | Paper | Cluster | Mapped connections |
|---|