Use the real paper title or the working argument.
Step 1
Paper setup
Lock the governing claim, domain, pressure, owner, and the sources and passages in section order. Henry can help name the claim. It cannot invent sources.
TXT, MD, DOCX
No outline loaded yet. Upload a .txt, .md, or .docx outline.
Older .doc files should be resaved as .docx first.
This frames the risk surface and the level of precision the packet must satisfy.
Pressure level decides how aggressively the packet should challenge its own wording.
Section order
Add sources and passages in section order: Literature review, Background and Context, Theories and Concepts, Analysis, Findings, Discussion, Conclusion.
Step 2
Map the claims
Keep the paper's governing claims in three lanes: direct evidence, supported inference, unresolved unknowns.
Method rule: if a claim outruns its visible source anchor, narrow it or mark it as
unresolved. Do not let fluent wording impersonate evidence.
Accuracy boundary: seeded claims are heuristic candidates based on visible lexical cues.
Confirm the text, class, and anchor note manually before letting any seeded line travel.
0 claims mapped
0 direct 0 inferred 0 unresolved
No claims yet. Seed candidates from the manuscript, then keep or drop each line.
Step 3
Mark the checks you ran
Tick only what you actually did. Low or medium pressure needs one check or a contradiction note. High or critical pressure needs the pre-pass, overclaim, and unresolved-unknown checks (c3, c5, and c6).
Progress 0 / 6 passed
Step 4
Run the three Henry reviews
Supportive, cold-method, and harsh. All three must come from a Cloudflare Worker on this manuscript. Local heuristic notes do not count. Invented citations are flagged.
This is the main action on this step. One click sends the frozen packet to the Cloudflare Worker.
Supportive focus
Confirms what the manuscript already anchors well and where the argument is behaving responsibly.
Awaiting review trigger.
Cold-method focus
Evaluates inference drift, missing source classes, and unearned causality without praise language.
Awaiting review trigger.
Harsh focus
Names the single sentence most likely to fail under cross-examination and explains why.
Awaiting review trigger.
Step 5
Name who owns the next review
One complete row: owner, finding, evidence, and interval. Without it the packet is not ready.
Gate: export should not travel without at least one complete control row. If nobody owns
the next review, the packet is not ready.
Step 6
Export the paper packet
Download one markdown file with the governing claim, reviews, disclosure, and the named owner of the next revision.
Markdown export
Ready for bounded export1 of 6 · toward claims